dsimcha Wrote: > Some discussions about std.parallelism have prompted an examination of > how far D's guarantees against low level data races should extend and > how safety and practicality should be balanced.
I didn't follow the review of std.parallelism, can you give some specific examples? Users of languages look to standard libraries as a model for how to write their own apps. I don't like your proposal and think std.parallelism should use shared properly. I'd like to understand better what your issues with shared were. I've done a descent amount of shared-correct code, so I'm pretty sure it's usable. In fact, the only really nasty bug I had could have been caught if std.thread had been shared-correct...
