On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 12:32 -0400, bearophile wrote: > dsimcha: > > > I tried to keep it as consistent as possible with std.algorithm. > > OK. Then the question is why std.algorithm uses normal strings instead of q{} > ones.
Actually the question why user strings at all, why not have a lambda function syntax that is less verbose? > And regarding consistency with std.algorithm, a more important factor > is that std.algorithm.map is lazy, while you have a eager map, and the > lazy version has lazy in the name, so the names are kind of opposite > of std.algorithm. Is there actually any point in having a lazy parallel map? > > Unfortunately I don't have access to this kind of hardware except at work. > > Maybe some other person in this group has access to a 8 core CPU and > is willing to take some numbers, to create few little graphs. I have such hardware, if someone sends me a program to execute I can run it a few times to get a dataset. -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@russel.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part