"David Nadlinger" <s...@klickverbot.at> wrote in message news:inijsn$m9r$1...@digitalmars.com... > On 4/6/11 10:41 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote: >>> I don't think having fixed-size image will be a useful optimization, >>> except perhaps if you manipulate a lot of tiny images of the same size. >>> >> >> Manipulating images in software involves accessing a *lot* of pixels, so >> you >> have a very big "inner loop" situation. If the width isn't >> statically-known, >> then:[.] > > If you want to write something generic that actually performs well, the > Adobe/Boost »Generic Image Library« might be an interesting example: > www.boost.org/doc/libs/release/libs/gil/doc/index.html >
Just took a brief glance. Does seem potentially interesting. Appears to essentially be a C++ std.range/std.algorithm for images. I can imagine a similar approach might be fruitful for us.
