No I was wondering if a different compiler would treat the assignment of &g to f as needing to generate a conversion from int* to int internally (which I think is what Timon was expecting?), or if it would generate an error because the signature of f does not match the signature of g (which is what I would expect.)
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com > wrote: > I'm using DMD 2.052. Why, are you allowed to declare delegates with ref > returns? >
