On 12.04.2011 2:31, Spacen Jasset wrote:
On 11/04/2011 20:58, spir wrote:
[slightly OT]
Hello,
I'm reading (just for interest) the LLVM Coding Standards at
http://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html. Find them very interesting
because their purposes are clearly explained. Below sample.
Denis
[snip]
Instead you could just have:
loop
{
...
if (condition) exit;
...
}
instead of WHILE and DO. Whereby you *must* have an exit condition.
But I suppose you need a FOR loop because the following may be error
prone.
int x=0;
loop
{
if x > 9 exit;
....
x++;
}
Looks a lot like PL/SQL;)
So you would then end up with a LOOP a FOREVER (perhaps which is
for(;;) by convention anyway) and a FOR loop.
I'll put the coffee down now...
--
Dmitry Olshansky
