What he said. Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 12, 2011, at 12:53 AM, Don <nos...@nospam.com> wrote: > dsimcha wrote: >> This message is to formally request a resumption of the review for >> std.parallelism, now that Jacob has submitted a pull request for >> std.net.isemail and GSoC proposals aren't taking up most of the community's >> attention. I suggest one additional week of review, since the module has >> had some pretty significant review already, with a week of voting after. If >> significant changes are requested and agreed to by me, votes can be >> contingent on the changes being made before committing std.parallelism to >> Phobos. >> Lars Kyllingstad is the review manager and Andrei is unofficially the BDFL >> of Phobos, so both please approve this. >> Code: >> https://github.com/dsimcha/std.parallelism/blob/master/parallelism.d >> Docs: >> http://cis.jhu.edu/~dsimcha/d/phobos/std_parallelism.html > > Extremely important functionality, and a solid piece of work. It's already a > higher standard than most of Phobos. > I think it's pretty obvious that this should be included. >
