On 04/14/2011 07:58 PM, "Jérôme M. Berger" wrote:
spir wrote:
Actually, I have never been pleased that func defs (1) look like func
calls (2) have an exceptional syntax compared to other definitions. I'd
like instead eg:
square = function (int n) int {
return n * n;
}
That is still different from other definitions where the type comes
first.
True. I was firstly evoking the "x = y" form.
But the following would work too:
function (int n) int square = {
return n*n;
}
And both would be easier to parse to boot:)
Yes, I like your format as well.
There are actually
languages out there with this kind of syntax.
Yop, I know (my example was Lua-like: we are not reinventing the wheel ;-)
Denis
--
_________________
vita es estrany
spir.wikidot.com
