== Quote from Steven Schveighoffer (schvei...@yahoo.com)'s article > On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 11:08:23 -0400, Alexander <aldem+dm...@nk7.net> wrote: > [...] > The name choice is no longer up for debate. It's already set in print, > and in the language. > -Steve
clear() is a library function which is itself having its behavior changed for the next DMD release. I think changing it to a more descriptive name such as destroy() is feasible. Especially when there are existing class methods already called clear(). Even newcomers from C++ are used to clear() as a common method name from STL classes.
