On 28.04.2011 21:46, Timon Gehr wrote: > Why is 'in' not currently defined on arrays? To me it seems like a left-out > that > should be fixed, because it has quite obvious and useful semantics.
+1. It would be very useful and convenient this way, especially if search will be optimized to series of comparisons for small item count. Perhaps we should file a feature request? :) /Alexander