On 30.04.2011 01:21, Denis Koroskin wrote: > That's just an optimizer issue. Even if you replace the code body with > "return false;" (i.e. not found) it's STILL slower than straight comparison.
2x? Hardly, IMHO. /Alexander
On 30.04.2011 01:21, Denis Koroskin wrote: > That's just an optimizer issue. Even if you replace the code body with > "return false;" (i.e. not found) it's STILL slower than straight comparison.
2x? Hardly, IMHO. /Alexander