On Mon, 16 May 2011 15:53:38 -0400, Timon Gehr <timon.g...@gmx.ch> wrote:
In fact I even need to take that back. In order to work correctly, the
function would have to iterate downwards. It _is_ indeed buggy, and I
should stop emitting opinions when I'm short on time...
Andrei
Whoops, you are right:
void removeAt(T)(ref T[] arr, size_t index)
{
foreach (i, ref item; retro(arr[1 .. index+1]))
item = arr[i - 1];
arr = arr[1 .. $];
}
Hehe, won't work. Ranges can only support a single foreach parameter.
I think you may have to resort to for loops here (/me purposely ignores
the hideous beast foreach_reverse). Be very careful with indexes on that
one.
-Steve
