"bearophile" < bearophileh...@lycos.com> wrote in message news:it5gqj$a1g$1...@digitalmars.com... > Andrei: > >> If we all get convinced that named parameters are worth it, > > I think this is not going to happen because some people (two?) don't want > this feature. > > I am for it, if it's well implemented. The reordering is one important > part of this feature. > An optional sub-feature is a way to deprecate argument names. Thankfully > in D there is already the deprecated keyword; a first idea: > > void foo(int deprecated(y) x) {} > Or: > void foo(int deprecated{y} x) {} >
I like it!