Jonathan M Davis wrote: > stringz is neither a type nor a word. It *is* a word. A stringz is a string that ends in zero. This family of traditional names (STRINGZ, ASCIZ, etc.) predates C itself.
On the other hand, there is *no such thing* as a StringZ. You'd never call it a "string zero". You'd call it a "zero terminated string", or maybe a "C string". Changing it to "toCString" is completely pointless, a cost without a benefit, but at least it's not a completely nonsensical name like toStringZ.
