Daniel Gibson Wrote: > No. > The whole point of toStringz() is that it returns a string that can be > fed to normal C functions that work on strings. > And C functions expect a "string" to be a char* (or wchar*) pointing to > a block of memory containing the string and terminated by '\0'. > The functionality of toStringz() should not change. > This is just about the name.
Why don't you like to!c_str(); ?
