Re: Naming conventions for functions in similar modules

[Walter Bright]

On 6/21/2011 10:38 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
For example, should we have
std.ascii.toLower and std.uni.toLower or std.ascii.toAsciiLower and
std.uni.toUniLower?


I think we've failed if we have to name things std.ascii.toAsciiLower, i.e. 
having to repeat the module name in the function name in order to disambiguate it.