Re: std.path review: update

[Vladimir Panteleev]

On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 18:07:12 +0300, Lars T. Kyllingstad  
<public@kyllingen.nospamnet> wrote:

The fact that extension() currently *does* behave as Vladimir wants is,
in my opinion, an implementation detail.

Is it still an implementation detail if it's documented behavior?

--
Best regards,
 Vladimir                            mailto:vladi...@thecybershadow.net