On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 20:47:20 +0200, torhu wrote: > I didn't suggest joinPaths, because the inputs are not always paths, > generally you join things like a path to a directory together with just > a filename. Maybe it's ok to call it all just 'paths', I don't know. > But the output is commonly a path, hence buildPath. Would be > interesting to know what other people think, though.
See my answer to Steve. I'm considering expanding joinPath's charter a bit, allowing it to take an input range of path segments and perform normalization while concatenating them. buildPath would be a good name for this. -Lars
