"David Nadlinger" <s...@klickverbot.at> wrote in message news:j068tj$4fv$1...@digitalmars.com... > On 7/7/11 8:19 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote: >> [.]But DSource is better for >> forums and issue tracking. So I would just use both - code hosting at >> github >> and forums/issue-tracking at dsource. > > I doubt that DSource is really the better option for issue tracking. > First, GitHub rolled out »Issues 2.0« a few months ago, which now has > support for assigning bugs, milestones, etc. I personally haven't used it > for a large project yet, but Ruby on Rails switched to it (they previously > used Lighthouse), so I suppose it is quite fit for the purpose. > > Second, at least for QtD, there is a massive problem with using the > DSource Trac instance: Spam. I don't know if this affects other projects > as well, and you might not actually notice it that much because we usually > hard-delete spammy tickets/changes via the admin panel, but it is > definitely annoying. >
I might have been thinking of BitBucket. BitBucket's issue system is horrid.
