On 01-08-2011 09:39, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Monday 01 August 2011 15:02:54 KennyTM~ wrote:
On Aug 1, 11 13:56, %u wrote:
How do you plan on camelCasing pure, nothrow, out, ref, etc?
pure_, nothrow_, out_, ref_
pureAttribute, nothrowAttribute, outAttribute, refAttribute
Yeah. Something like that. You'd have to add a prefix or a suffix to them all.
But the fact that you can't actually just camelcase them might be a good
argument for leaving them as-is. If we're willing to change them though, a
simple prefix or suffix shouldn't be all that big a deal - especially if it's
shorter rather than longer.
- Jonathan M Davis
I may very well be biased since I come from .NET land, but I have to
say, camel case enum member names do seem a bit weird to me. While enum
members could be argued to be fields, they certainly don't have those
semantics, so maybe pascal case might not be so bad?
- Alex
