On 08/14/2011 10:00 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Sun, 14 Aug 2011 22:48:18 +0300, Timon Gehr <timon.g...@gmx.ch> wrote:requiring lazy before lazy arguments basically destroys the reason for lazy being in the language: int foo(lazy 2*3); is not better than int foo({return 2*3});What about requiring "lazy" only for non-pure delegates?
Actually I would rather require lazy arguments to be pure, so that they can be guaranteed to be executed at most once.
