On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 17:04:07 -0400, dsimcha <[email protected]> wrote:

I'm getting annoying runtime errors about "Cycle detected between modules with ctors/dtors" in a large program that doesn't have any module c'tors/d'tors, at least not explicitly. (i.e. there's no static this or static ~this in the whole project, not counting the libs it imports). Is there any way a module c'tor/d'tor could be hidden, such that there is one even if there's no actual
static this statement?

From what I understand of how the compiler works, such ctor/dtors are put into compiler-generated modules marked as "standalone", meaning they should be ignored in terms of cycle detection (even though they *do* have ctor/dtors).

Do you have an example? It may be a bug in the compiler/cycle detection algorithm.

-Steve

Reply via email to