Andrei Alexandrescu: > http://clang-developers.42468.n3.nabble.com/Clang-SAFECode-Release-Announcement-td3265143.html
>Thanks for the info. Walter and my perception is that safety is big and becoming huge, so SafeD was a good bet (props to Bartosz Milewski for first proposing it).< The purpose of that SAFECode is very different from the purpose of D @safe: it's a tool to help find bugs in unsafe code, while @safe merely disallows some memory-unsafe operations. I presume both things are needed, because sometimes you need to write unsafe code too. I'd like some optional functionality like SAFECode in the D compiler too. Bye, bearophile
