On 8/30/11, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisp...@gmx.com> wrote:
> But
> it's
> definitely true that allowing overloads between templatized and
> non-templatized
> functions would be an improvement. Hopefully, we get it at some point.

Seeing as example code that uses such overloading is already in TDPL,
this is probably only a matter of time before it's implemented.

Reply via email to