On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 16:41:19 -0400, Simen Kjaeraas
<simen.kja...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 22:22:52 +0200, Walter Bright
<newshou...@digitalmars.com> wrote:
I do think that the "this() @disable;" is an ugly syntax, and I cringe
when seeing it. But I can't think of anything better. It does make
logical sense given the existence of default construction syntax and
the @disable, so in a sense it is just connecting existing dots, which
has a compelling value.
I think it's perfect, you just need the words to trade places:
@disable this(); One could argue that @disabled would work better, but
that's a can of worms I'm not touching.
I think it works on both sides. And I agree, it's not that cringeworthy,
especially if you put it on the left.
-Steve
