"zsxxsz" <zsx...@263.net> wrote in message news:j4o0nn$2igh$1...@digitalmars.com... > == Quote from Adam Ruppe (destructiona...@gmail.com)'s article >> zsxxsz wrote: >> > I think the cgi module is lower effecient. >> That's not really true. The reason CGI has a perception of being >> slow is because it's used by slow languages most the time, but with >> D, it's fast. > I don't think so. Because I've been using C to write cgi. One http request > one > fork cgi which is the reason of slowly performance cgi. The fork process > is > expensive for any OS.
Accessing a DB, using JS, and sending a page across the internet are all far, far slower than forking.
