"Steven Schveighoffer" , dans le message (digitalmars.D:145738), a >> It is always possible for a non-const version of opEqual to forward to >> the const version, so people willing to use a const version do not have >> to define a non-const version. > > Again, you still need to define both, this is not a good situation.
No, I didn't express myself correctly. The non-const version should forward to the const version *by default*.
