Gor Gyolchanyan <gor.f.gyolchan...@gmail.com> wrote: > The whole point was to put the question mark to a better use. > I mean, it's used in the ternary operator exclusively. > It's such a waste of a token. > The question mark logically belongs to bools (which goes good with the > ternary operator), but the bools are much more ofter worked with in > the form of predicates, so I'd want to make that question mark more > useful.
That could be said to '-' which is only used for subtaction. What a waste of token. I'd say as long as the symbol alone is a valid token, it should never be part of an identifier, doing else just gonna confuse anybody coming from C-like languages, i.e. C, C++, C#, D, Java, JavaScript, etc. -1. You've got a slightly better chance if you've suggested '#'.
