I've not had a proper look at the code yet, but I recall from when I read the docs during the pre-review period that the introduction was a little on the informal side. It doesn't seem to have changed since then, and IMHO the introduction/description needs a bit of a polish to bring it up to the standard that is required of official documentation.

I'll be busy over the next few weeks, but I will try to make time to assemble some more specific comments. I just wanted to let you know that I thought the docs needed some work, just in case.

A...

Reply via email to