Anyway, I'm writing a general-purpose parser base, so i won't need it for now. And when i do, I'd like to have a correct grammar definition, so i can feed it to my parser. Who should i ask to ensure it's correctness?
Once I'm done, I'll send a pull request for something around "etc.dcfe" for "D compiler front end". It won't be perfect, of course, but it will be a start, from which the front-end would be gradually developed. I wanna at least have an AST parser by the time i make the pull request. On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Timon Gehr <timon.g...@gmx.ch> wrote: > On 10/23/2011 02:16 PM, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote: >> >> Yeah, i know about EBNF, but it uses completely different syntax. >> I'm really excited about having a standard D compiler front-end as a >> library solution, so i though it would be best to parse the syntax >> from the syntax definition of dpl.org >> > > That can currently not be done. The syntax specification on dpl.org is out > of date and contains many errors and inaccuracies. (at least it was that way > the last time I checked) >
