On Sun, 2011-10-23 at 10:36 -0700, Walter Bright wrote: > On 10/23/2011 1:52 AM, Russel Winder wrote: > > Certainly: That the world of dynamic linking is slightly different from > > that of static linking. > > I think that line is arbitrary and doesn't really exist. For example, what > does > that mean when template code gets stuffed in the .h files?
The line may be arbitrary but it does exists, witness the fact that you responded to it and is can still be found on the servers :-) I was focusing the notion of dynamic binding as in Python, Java, etc. which is generally where all the perceived problems are regarding LGPL. Hasn't the issue of source code distribution (of templates) in C++ (and D?) been hashed out, it's what resulted in the Boost licence in the first place? -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@russel.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
