It's unclear whether a particular solution is easier to implement in D, or is easier to translate from C. These cases, which i enumerated seem to be easier to implement in D, because they're very high-level, which C doesn't work too good with.
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 2:30 PM, simendsjo <simend...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 25.10.2011 12:18, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote: >> >> yeah. 0MQ is the ultimate concurrency tool. I just love it. >> But i mean a D-solution, rather then a C-solution port. >> D's rich modeling power allows those concepts to be implemented in a >> whole new and incredibly flexible and easy-to-use way. > > Missing libraries is a big problem for D. It's much better to have wrappers > for c libraries until Ds community is large enough to have it's own > solutions. >