On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:23:10 -0400, Gor Gyolchanyan 
<gor.f.gyolchan...@gmail.com> wrote:
I need an extremely fast and small typeless container for a single
object, which i can use to implement a fast and efficient dynamic
callback mechanism, where the exact number and types of parameters are
only known to the callback and to the source of the parameter values
and all intermediate manager classes, who hold and return the callback
do not know it.

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Gor Gyolchanyan
<gor.f.gyolchan...@gmail.com> wrote:
Variant is heavy. It contains and does lots of things, that are not
always required.
a tiny type-less variable is versatile and can be used for any
purposes. It's even type-safe in debug mode.
Also, Variant needs explicit construction, whereas the tiny typeless
variable automatically accepts any value.
Also, Variant does not grant access to underlying raw data, but tiny
typeless value can be taken address of (void*).

Just because something is feature-full, doesn't make it heavy weight. But I 
guess over a raw tagged-union with a limited interface, it would be considered 
heavy. But, I don't understand you concept of a type-less variable. Truly 
type-less variables don't exist in any language; you always have a pluripotent 
dynamic type like variant under the hood.

Reply via email to