On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 19:13:57 +0100, Michel Fortin
<michel.for...@michelf.com> wrote:
On 2011-10-31 17:07:31 +0000, Sean Kelly <s...@invisibleduck.org> said:
writeThis really shouldn't be const, it should be shared. The problem
was t
hat making writeThis a shared pass by value param implied a
synchronized loa
d for writeThis, which is undesirable for cas. So I left the
declaration of c
as as specified in TDPL and thought I'd figure this out later.
Perhaps it should be Unqual!(shared(V2)). That way if V2 is a pointer
it'll be tail-shared.
That won't work for class references though. For that you'd need my
"const(Object)ref" patch rusting in DMD's pull requests.
It's a pitty that cas doesn't work with classes.
