On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 02:17:40 -0800, Jonathan M Davis wrote: > Actually, I'd argue that Row would be better than Record, since it _is_ > a row in a table. Personally, I'd find it to be more immediately clear > that way. With Record, I have to figure out what the heck it is a record > of, whereas Row is immediately obvious in this context. > > - Jonathan M Davis
It _is_ a record of data, just as much as it is a row in a table. The RFC I reference continuously refers to records and never even says "row."
