"Timon Gehr" <timon.g...@gmx.ch> wrote in message news:j9oorj$obn$1...@digitalmars.com... > On 11/13/2011 03:13 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote: >> >> And then, there's also complexities that are for the better. For example, >> C++ AFAIK doesn't have IFTI. IFTI *is* an additional set of >> rules/complexities *in the language*, but they're complexities that make >> the >> language easier to use. SImilar thing with the implicit conversion rules >> for >> primitive types: The rules for that are somewhat complicated, but they >> usually make using the language easier and safer. >> >> > > C++ allows instantiating function templates without explicitly giving the > type parameters. Or what exactly do you think C++ does not have? >
Hmm, I guess my C++ is just really rusty.
