This makes perfect sense to me as a new-comer, and having not had much
experience writing this sort of code, this is exactly how I would have
assumed it is now.
I would have been in for a confusing surprise had I tried to do any of this
stuff.
On 16 November 2011 05:24, bearophile <bearophileh...@lycos.com> wrote:
> The Bugzilla issues that I really care about is a not an useless long
> list, it's about fifteen items long, and this post is about one of them.
>
> I think current array slice assign syntax is a bit messy, and I think this
> should be addressed.
>
> Kenji Hara has recently written a very nice program (that here I have
> modified a bit for clarity) that shows the current array assign situation:
>
>
> import std.stdio, std.typetuple;
>
> void main() {
> writeln("Rhs is an array, is it compilable?");
> writeln("a\t/ b\t\ta=b\ta[]=b\ta=b[]\ta[]=b[]");
>
> foreach (i, Lhs; TypeTuple!(int[3], int[]))
> foreach (j, Rhs; TypeTuple!(int[3], int[])) {
> writef("%s\t/ %s ", Lhs.stringof, Rhs.stringof);
> Lhs a = [0,0,0];
> Rhs b = [1,2,3];
> writef("\t%s", __traits(compiles, { a = b; }));
> writef("\t%s", __traits(compiles, { a[] = b; }));
> writef("\t%s", __traits(compiles, { a = b[]; }));
> writef("\t%s", __traits(compiles, { a[] = b[]; }));
> writeln();
> }
>
>
> writeln("\nRhs is a element, is it compilable?");
> writeln("a\t\t\ta=N\ta[]=N\ta[0..2]=N");
>
> foreach (Lhs; TypeTuple!(int[3], int[])) {
> writef("%s\t\t", Lhs.stringof);
> Lhs a = [0,0,0];
> writef("\t%s", __traits(compiles, { a = 9; }));
> writef("\t%s", __traits(compiles, { a[] = 9; }));
> writef("\t%s", __traits(compiles, { a[0..2] = 9; }));
> writeln();
> }
> }
>
>
>
> Currently (DMD 2.057head, despite I think Walter has not updated DMD
> version number yet) it prints:
>
>
> Rhs is an array, is it compilable?
> a / b a=b a[]=b a=b[] a[]=b[]
> int[3u] / int[3u] true true true true
> int[3u] / int[] true true true true
> int[] / int[3u] true true true true
> int[] / int[] true true true true
>
> Rhs is a element, is it compilable?
> a a=N a[]=N a[0..2]=N
> int[3u] true true true
> int[] false true true
>
>
>
> This also means this is currently accepted:
>
> void main() {
> int[3] a;
> a = 1;
> assert(a == [1, 1, 1]);
> }
>
>
> While this is not accepted:
>
> void main() {
> int[] b = new int[3];
> b = 1;
> assert(b == [1, 1, 1]); //Error: cannot implicitly convert expression
> (1) of type int to int[]
> }
>
>
>
> I'd like D to require a[]=1 in that first case too.
>
> I'd like the [] to be required every time an O(n) vector operation is
> done, for:
> - constancy with all other vector operations among two arrays, that
> require [];
> - and to avoid unwanted (and not easy to spot in the code) O(n) operations;
> - bugs and confusion in D newbies that don't have memorized all current
> special cases.
>
> On the other hand Don says that [] is only required for lvalues.
>
> I think this boils to a new table like this:
>
>
> Rhs is an array, is it compilable?
> a / b a=b a[]=b a=b[] a[]=b[]
> int[3u] / int[3u] FALSE true FALSE true
> int[3u] / int[] FALSE true FALSE true
> int[] / int[3u] FALSE true FALSE true
> int[] / int[] true true true true
>
> Rhs is a element, is it compilable?
> a a=N a[]=N a[0..2]=N
> int[3u] FALSE true true
> int[] false true true
>
>
> Now if there's a [] on the left, then it's an O(n) vector operation (like
> a copy), otherwise it's O(1).
>
> That also means:
>
> void main() {
> int[] a = new int[3];
> int[] b = new int[3];
> a = b; // OK, copies just array fat reference
> }
>
> void main() {
> int[3] a, b;
> a = b; // Not OK, hidden vector op
> }
>
>
> I am not sure this new table is fully correct, but it's a start. Fixes of
> mistakes are welcomes.
>
> -----------------------
>
> This is an alternative proposal.
>
> On the other hand this vector op syntax doesn't currently compile:
>
> void main() {
> int[3] a, b;
> a[] += b;
> }
>
>
> So if array assign is seen as a normal vector op, then the [] is needed on
> the right too:
>
>
> Rhs is an array, is it compilable?
> a / b a=b a[]=b a=b[] a[]=b[]
> int[3u] / int[3u] FALSE FALSE FALSE true
> int[3u] / int[] FALSE FALSE FALSE true
> int[] / int[3u] FALSE FALSE FALSE true
> int[] / int[] true FALSE FALSE true
>
> Rhs is a element, is it compilable?
> a a=N a[]=N a[0..2]=N
> int[3u] FALSE true true
> int[] false true true
>
>
> Where the two cases with dynamic arrays are syntax errors to keep more
> symmetry:
>
> void main() {
> int[] a = new int[3];
> int[] b = new int[3];
> a[] = b; // error
> a = b[]; // error
> }
>
> -----------------------
>
> Lot of time ago I have opened bug issue 3971 on this topic, but that
> Bugzilla thread contains various mistakes and some parts of it are obsolete.
>
> Bye,
> bearophile
>
