On 11/16/2011 08:08 PM, Joachim Wuttke <[email protected]> wrote:
Compare
(1) Y[] = X[]*X[];
(2) Y[] = sin( X[] );
With gdc 4.4.6,
(1) compiles and executes as I expected, whereas
(2) is not allowed (fails at compile time).
Why?
The semantics of (2) is unambiguous,
and it works perfectly well in Fortran90.
Allowing (2) would make D really attractive
for formula-heavy mathematical work.
- Joachim
I like it, but there is a problem:
(2) is already valid code if you have these two overloads:
float sin(float x);
float[] sin(float[] x);
So with your rule it would be ambiguous.