If you compare your product to another one you're implying that the other product is better in some way. Generally a bad idea to do so.
Sent from my iPhone On Nov 17, 2011, at 10:34 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu <seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org> wrote: > At any rate, I wouldn't want the D intro page to mention any other language. > > Andrei > > On 11/17/11 8:05 AM, Paulo Pinto wrote: >> Hi, >> >> the only issue with your sentence is that the "efficiency of native code" is >> also >> possible with C#. >> >> -- >> Paulo >> >> "Daniel Gibson"<metalcae...@gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:ja10k6$27j8$1...@digitalmars.com... >>> Am 16.11.2011 02:24, schrieb Jude Young: >>>> >>>> I see one camp that is against using multi-paradigm on the basis that >>>> it sounds buzz-wordy, and another camp for using because it does >>>> actually mean something specific. >>> >>> >>> I'm not against calling D "multi paradigm", I'm just against the style of >>> the "Modern convenience. Multi-paradigm power. Native efficiency." >>> sentences. It *sounds* buzzwordy, regardless of the words. >>> Even "Rusty bars. Heavy chains. Merciless guards." sounds like a cheap >>> commercial ;) >>> >>> OTOH "D is a modern, powerful multi-paradigm programming language that >>> combines the efficiency of native code with the convenience of modern >>> languages like C#" contains all those buzzwords but doesn't sound as bad. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> - Daniel >> >> >
