On 11/20/11 3:10 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Overall. It looks good. It's also more compact, which is probably a good thing. One thing that bothered me right off the bat though is "modeling power" in that my first reaction is "what kind of modeling power?" It feels to me like it needs an adjective in front of it. It's probably fine though - particularly since I can't think of what to put in front of it (high?). The thought behind it is solid, but I guess that the phrase is just a bit odd to me.
Keeping this in mind.
Nitpick: "giving the best of the static and dynamic worlds" would be slightly better IMHO as "giving the best of both the static and the dynamic worlds."
Done.
Nitpick: The + on the Example link is a nice improvement, but ideally it would change to a - when the example is visible. That might be more complicated than it's worth though. I don't know (since I'm not a web programmer).
Yes, that's part of the plan. Note that the "+" is a nice small Unicode "+", and probably the "-" will be the small Unicode "-".
Nitpick: "Best paradigm is to not impose..." sounds odd. Do you mean "The best paradigm..." or something else? Maybe it should be something more like "It is best to not impose one programming paradigm at the expense of others."
I wanted to put there a strong sentence a la "best organization is disorganization". I thought "best paradigm is no paradigm" but that would be too extreme.
Suggestion: Make RAII in the text a link to RAII on wikipedia. Also, scope should probably be turned into a link to scope statements in the documenation.
Done.
I really like the idea of having the prominent example rotate randomly from a list somewhere, but of course, that means that we need to come up with such a list, and coming up with good, concise examples like that generally seems to be difficult. If we can come up with even just a few though, it would still be a nice touch over having one, static example.
I'm sure we will. I wonder how I can superimpose on the code frame a small text in the bottom right saying "[your code here]" linked to a submission form. That way we advertise the contest right where the prize is!
I find it interesting that whatever you did with the news section this time around actually shows up properly in Konqueror, whereas before it didn't (Konqueror is generally quite standards compliant, but that doesn't always translate to showing stuff correctly - especially with advanced web 2.0 kind of stuff).
I issued a window.stop() after the twitter code.
Overall, it looks good to me. But from the previous comments, I think that others are far pickier than I am about the content (e.g. multi-paradigm was fine with me).
Thanks for your input! Andrei
