On 2011-12-03 19:34, Marco Leise wrote:
Am 03.12.2011, 19:20 Uhr, schrieb Nick Sabalausky <a@a.a>:
FWIW, SWT would probably be somewhere in the top 3, definitely above qt
(because I *think* SWT is true native...?), but not sure how I'd rank it
compared to wx b/c I'd have to actually try them both out.
As far as I understood it SWT was written for Eclipse. It may fall
behind the other toolkits in terms of features and it is written in
Java, so using it means a true D reimplementation of the API unless
someone already did a C port. I think the small and native aspect made
it a good candidate for inclusion into Phobos in the past. The much
other toolkits are just too big.
We may all have good eyes and such, but maybe the accessibility aspect
should also be considered in this discussion.
DWT already exists and is a port of SWT to D. There's also a C++ port of
SWT available, but only for Windows. I think SWT is at least as capable
as wxWidgets.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
