On Wednesday, December 07, 2011 09:16:48 Don wrote: > On 06.12.2011 09:37, bearophile wrote: > > Don: > >> Right. But it's hard to come up with high-priority language issues > >> these days. The old ones have been fixed.<g>.<> > > There are several things that I'd like to see fixed/improved in D still. > > Yes, of course. But most of the showstoppers are done. > Not so long ago there were major features in the spec or in TDPL that > weren't implemented at all - contracts, @safe, pure, inout, TDPL > operator overloading, almost nothing worked in CTFE, Phobos didn't > compile on 64 bits, ...
Where does the compiler stand with multiple alias thises (as TDPL describes). AFAIK, it still doesn't support them at all. That would be a major feature from TDPL which hasn't be implemented. But yes, a lot of work has been done, and we're much closer to having everything fully implemented. - Jonathan M Davis