"Danny Wilson" <da...@decube.net> wrote in message news:jbrjp6$n54$1...@digitalmars.com... > Nick Sabalausky wrote: > >> So anyway, with my own Haxe implementation, I can just add an optional >> "-sane" switch to enable either a runtime or compile-time check...And >> nobody >> can stop me!! Mwuuahahahaha!! AH HA HA HA!!! BWAH HA HA HA!@!!! >> > > HAHhahahaAHHAAHA - As a long time haXe user I appreciate this! :D >
Heh :) > But, have you looked at the new haXe macro output feature?: > http://haxe.org/api/haxe/macro/jsgenapi > > You could write a D generator macro which acts as a JS target. Probably > alot less work too. > I'm happy with the progress I'm making so far on with my approach, but that is an interesting idea. > I find it unfortunate D -> haXe is so complex, as I'd much rather write my > code in D. If only D was as multiplatform as haXe... :-( Yes, me too. Definitely. I would still like to get around to that sometime. This Haxe->D will probably help give me some good language converstion experience, though.