On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 16:28:03 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer
<schvei...@yahoo.com> wrote:
So why don't we just leave the code size situation as-is? 500kb is not
a terribly significant amount, but dlls are on the horizon (Walter has
publicly said so). Then size becomes a moot point.
If we get reflection, then you will find that having excluded all the
runtime information when not used is going to hamper D's reflection
capability, and we'll probably have to start putting it back in anyway.
In short, dlls will solve the problem, let's work on that instead of
shuffling around code.
The other valid option I see is removing the link to the virtual tables,
thereby disabling reflection via factory until we can implement full
reflection.
-Steve
