On 12/28/2011 05:59 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-12-28 13:54, bearophile wrote:
Timon Gehr:
=> expr
should imo be a shorthand for
() => expr.
It saves some ((())(()))().
It saves few (), but zero argument lambdas aren't that common in my
functional-style code, and I think it decreases syntax uniformity and
code readability. So I think it's a bad idea.
It can already be done with the lazy arguments.
void foo (lazy int a)
{
auto b = a();
}
int bar ();
foo(bar());
It is not the same thing. lazy arguments do not create a closure.
