On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Timon Gehr <timon.g...@gmx.ch> wrote:
> On 01/02/2012 09:00 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote: > >> "maarten van damme"<maartenvd1...@gmail.com**> wrote in message >> news:mailman.1985.1325157846.**24802.digitalmars-d@puremagic.**com... >> >>> I think it would be an object oriented language, I'm a believer in the >>> string theory :) >>> >> >> I heard on the Science Channel that M-theory was becoming favored over >> string therory. (Not that I would actually know.) >> >> I have actually thought of the whole universe as one big simulation, >>> would >>> really explain how light waves without medium (like a math function). >>> >>> >> I came across a book one time that talked about the 'verse basically being >> one big quantum computer. I didn't actually red through it though, and I >> can't remember what it was called... :( >> >> If I were god I would def use object oriented because it makes for easy >>> describing of different particles and strings. and I'm pretty sure there >>> is >>> no garbage collector included in gods language :p >>> >>> >> If I were god, then I'd presumably be omnipotent, and if I were >> omnipotent, >> then I'd be able to do it all in something like FuckFuck, or that >> shakesperian language, or that lolcat language without any difficulty. >> And I >> could just fix any limitations in the implementation. So that would seem >> the >> best option :) >> >> >> > God cannot be omnipotent. If he was, he could invent a task he cannot > solve. > He has; the human race.
