On 1/7/12 10:19 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Saturday, 7 January 2012 at 16:10:32 UTC, Don wrote:
Sorry Andrei, I have to disagree with that in the strongest possible
terms. I would have mentioned AAs as a very strong argument in the
opposite direction!
Amen. AAs are *still* broken from this change.
Well they are broken because the change has not been carried to completion.
I think that baking AAs in the compiler is poor programming language
design. There are absolutely no ifs and buts about it, and the matter is
obvious enough to me and sufficiently internalized to cause me
difficulty to argue it.
Andrei
