On 1/15/12 6:38 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 01/16/2012 01:35 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/15/12 6:30 PM, Peter Alexander wrote:
On 15/01/12 11:56 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Monday, January 16, 2012 00:41:14 Timon Gehr wrote:
Well, struct literals are lvalues, at least in DMD.
Yeah. I don't understand that. I've argued about it with Walter before.
Apparently they are in C++ as well. I don't understand it. It makes it
so that
In C++, struct literals are rvalues. C++ just has a special rule that
const references can bind to rvalues (but non-const references cannot),
That's a bad rule that we shouldn't copy.
Andrei
What do you think is an optimal rule regarding struct
literals/lvalues/rvalues and ref parameters?
auto ref
Andrei
