On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:26:34 -0800 bls <[email protected]> wrote: > wxWidgets in 2.9.3 has closed the gap to QT. (webkit, f.i.) The > documentation is also very close to what QT has to offer thanks to > Doxygen.
Let's hope 3.0 will polish it even further. > I wonder how much sense it would make to port the PHP > parser/codegenerator source (wxPHP) into python. You mean instead of porting to D (work done by Andrej)? > At least it should result in : More readable code, xml instead of > shitty json intermediate output for the D codegerator. For what would you use XML output? > Of couse I would be nice to use D. But the XML files are simply to > big to do DOM parsing. XPATH is required. I believe that our needs for DOM/XPATH parsing are not so big. :-) > Last thing. BCDGEN is using libxml2 to generate D code. and BCDGen > was the tool to created the libxml2 wrapper. Eat your own Dog food. Whatever tool can be made to help bind wx would be great...and considering there are some bindings for Sqlite3 (which, anyway, shoould not be too hard), we'd be satisfied to plunge into D project. :-) Finally, I hope that those of us interested to see active wxD project will be be smart-enough working together to overcome NiH syndrome. ;) Sincerely, Gour -- Whatever action a great man performs, common men follow. And whatever standards he sets by exemplary acts, all the world pursues. http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
