That would break the independence between parser and semantic
analyzer, because there's no way to disambiguate "bar" from "Foo.bar"
without knowing, that "Foo" is actually an enum.
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Jacob Carlborg <d...@me.com> wrote:
> On 2012-01-26 14:23, Trass3r wrote:
>>>
>>> It's not type safe in C. But you can wrap it in a struct with alias
>>> this instead.
>>
>>
>> Yep, but in D we have strong enums, so why not use them.
>
>
> What about be able to do something like this:
>
> enum Foo
> {
> public:
> bar,
> fooBar,
> }
>
> Foo f = bar;
>
> --
> /Jacob Carlborg
--
Bye,
Gor Gyolchanyan.
