That's a good question. Not being able to get upgrade pricing because the intermediate versions aren't available would be a problem, though I believe paying the upgrade vs. non-upgrade price may use the honor system anyway. You're right though, if someone hasn't upgraded yet then they. Ever will.
On Feb 11, 2012, at 12:18 AM, Don <nos...@nospam.com> wrote: > On 09.02.2012 17:07, Sean Kelly wrote: >> At this point, the only people on 10.4-5 should be those with PPC macs. I >> think 32-bit Intel owners may be stuck on 10.6. > > The link that Brad posted shows there are Intel users on 10.4 and 10.5. The > number of 10.4, 10.5 users is about four times higher than the number of PPC > macs. > Is 10.6 still available? I would imagine that anybody who didn't upgrade > early on, probably never will now. > > >>> "Walter Bright"<newshou...@digitalmars.com> wrote in message >>> news:jgvfu2$gmk$1...@digitalmars.com... >>>> Lately, dmd seems to have broken support for OS X 10.5. Supporting that >>>> system is problematic for us, since we don't have 10.5 systems available >>>> for dev/test. >>>> >>>> Currently, the build/test farm is OS X 10.7. >>>> >>>> I don't think this is like the Windows issue. Upgrading Windows is (for >>>> me, anyway) a full day job. Upgrading OS X is inexpensive and relatively >>>> painless, the least painless of any system newer than DOS that I've >>>> experienced. >>>> >>>> Hence, is it worthwhile to continue support for 10.5? Can we officially >>>> say that only 10.6+ is supported? Is there a significant 10.5 community >>>> that eschews OS upgrades but still expects new apps? >
